Suskind’s Latest Book Details How Obama’s Chosen Staff Undercut His Campaign Promises

No Comments

(This review of Ron Suskind’s latest book was written by Dan Froomkin for The Huffington Post.)

by Dan Froomkin

Barack Obama is heading back onto the campaign trail, running as a champion of the middle class and even hoping to harness the Occupy movement’s public anger at Wall Street.

But the higher he soars with his populist rhetoric, the more he calls attention to the enormous gap between the promise of hope and change that he campaigned on in 2008 and the actions he has taken as president — especially regarding the economy, which is still stagnating, and Wall Street, which remains unpunished and unbowed even after causing the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

As a result, voters will inevitably be asking themselves: Who is this guy, really? Does he mean what he says? Will he do what he says? And would a second-term Obama be different?

One answer to why Obama underperformed is laid out in searing detail in Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Ron Suskind’s latest book, Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington, and the Education of a President.

In the book, Suskind describes how Obama made the conscious choice to staff his economic team with former Clinton appointees whose sympathies were with Wall Street — and that those men were unable to see how drastically out of whack the country’s financial system had gotten both because they helped create it and because it had served them so well.

This is an in depth review of Suskind’s hard hitting and penetrating observations of the dilemma that Obama faced when he took office. It shows that the tentacles of Wall Street are everywhere.

Obama’s populist viewpoints were compromised by the timing (more…)

Hawking’s New Book: Why God Did Not Create the Universe

No Comments

Article in the Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2011

Why God Did Not Create the Universe

There is a sound scientific explanation for the making of our world—no gods required

By STEPHEN HAWKING And LEONARD MLODINOW

According to Viking mythology, eclipses occur when two wolves, Skoll and Hati, catch the sun or moon. At the onset of an eclipse people would make lots of noise, hoping to scare the wolves away. After some time, people must have noticed that the eclipses ended regardless of whether they ran around banging on pots.

This article in the Wall Street Journal was the subject of an article in The Deseret News that is also posted on Watts Cookin’. Our comments are attached within the Deseret News commentary posted under the headline “Hawking’s New Book Dismisses God”. Hawking is widely regarded as one of the smartest men in the world, if not number one, and it is worth our time to listen and learn.

Ignorance of nature’s ways led people in ancient times to postulate many myths in an effort to make sense of their world. But eventually, people turned to philosophy, that is, to the use of reason—with a good dose of intuition—to decipher their universe. Today we use reason, mathematics and experimental test—in other words, modern science.

Albert Einstein said, “The most incomprehensible thing (more…)

Hawking’s New Book Dismisses God, Gets Immediate Retaliation

No Comments

In the beginning: Stephen Hawking’s new book dismisses God’s role in our universe

By Michael De Groote

Deseret News

Published: Friday, Feb. 4, 2011 7:10 p.m. MST

When British physicist Stephen Hawking came into the auditorium at Caltech in Pasadena, Calif., the crowd went wild. The Los Angeles Times reported that one fan, 13-year-old Evan Hetland, even dubbed him “the nerd pope.”

Hawking was somewhat the darling of some religious people for his occasional references to God, such as one time when he said that if a complete theory of physics were discovered, then “we would know the mind of God.”

But Hawking’s latest book, “The Grand Design,” written with physicist Leonard Mlodinow, leaves little room for God — or philosophy for that matter. A Wall Street Journal article they wrote based on their book is titled “Why God Did Not Create the Universe: There is a sound scientific explanation for the making of our world — no gods required.”

Ouch.

“Ouch,” my eye! There is no ‘ouch’ for believers. Nevertheless, a compliment to the Deseret News for publishing this story. Hawking’s views are significant and obviously puts religious folks in a defensive posture. As expected the article by Michael DeGroote couldn’t be printed in the Deseret News without a significant counter punch that deflects the issue, and it is good and credible journalism to present opposing points of view.

Believers can take a punch better than anyone. Facts seldom hit a believer square on, they are almost always deflected. Believers are resilient beyond, no pun intended, ‘belief.’  There is no penetration. Once they have talked with God (more…)

A New Paradigm: The Economics of Happiness

No Comments

Published on Friday, January 14, 2011

by The Economics of Happiness – the Movie The Economics of Happiness

Economic globalization has led to a massive expansion in the scale and power of big business and banking. It has also worsened nearly every problem we face: fundamentalism and ethnic conflict; climate chaos and species extinction; financial instability and unemployment. There are personal costs too. For the majority of people on the planet life is becoming increasingly stressful. We have less time for friends and family and we face mounting pressures at work.

See the trailer to the movie at this link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZL0dp-xzhw

The Economics of Happiness describes a world moving simultaneously in two opposing directions. On the one hand, government and big business continue to promote globalization and the consolidation of corporate power. At the same time, all around the world people are resisting those policies, demanding a re-regulation (more…)

Mencken’s Prejudices Series Makes Great Reading

No Comments

Los Angeles Times

Published: January 7, 2011 08:52AM

There are writers whose books are stacked on my nightstand: G.K. Chesterton, Samuel Johnson, Thomas Babington Macaulay — writers whom I spend half an hour with before nodding off. They are master prose stylists whose command and fluency of English are the pleasure of reading them, even if the subjects, people and times they write about are unfamiliar and distant to our contemporary minds.

Now I can add to that nightstand stack the recently published boxed set of the Library of America edition of H.L. Mencken’s Prejudices series, which comprises the six volumes published between 1919 and 1927. Reading one or two of Menken’s reviews and essays is the kind of thing that you want to take, like a restorative, before bedtime, to counter the ill writing and easy thinking that daily pass before our eyes.

The Prejudices series is a compilation of reworked reviews and essays that Mencken originally wrote for literary journals and newspapers that contain his unexpurgated opinions about American writers, culture and society. Each volume contains between 30 and 40 essays and reviews ranging over literature, art, politics, philosophy, religion and science. He was a newspaper columnist in the fullest sense: No topic or subject was out of reach (and perhaps some should have been. Mencken (more…)

Deseret News Feature Story: Michael McConnell

No Comments

By Jamshid Ghazi Askar

Deseret News

Published: Sunday, Jan. 9, 2011 12:55 a.m. MST

Twenty-one years ago Michael W. McConnell was an up-and-coming professor at the University of Chicago Law School writing a complicated article about the legal meaning of “free exercise of religion” for the Harvard Law Review. During the revision process a law review student editor left such an impression on McConnell that he convinced Chicago Law School to grant the student a faculty fellowship upon graduation.

“He was an unusually good editor,” McConnell recalls. “He entered into the project in a way that I think helped me to make it a better article from the point of view of what I wanted it to be. He had some very intelligent organizational suggestions and was just very impressive.”

The Harvard Law Review editor who caught McConnell’s eye was Barack Obama.

“We had the opportunity of chatting quite a bit, and I knew he was planning to return to the south side of Chicago,” McConnell said. “It just seemed like a natural (fit) to connect him with the law school.”

In a vacuum, McConnell’s interaction with Obama could seem somewhat extraordinary. But playing an integral role in the ascension of a future president of the United States cannot be considered mere coincidence when placed within the greater context of McConnell’s career. Rather it’s indicative of a pattern in the life of the former University of Utah professor, because time and again McConnell has demonstrated a propensity for gravitating toward interesting assignments and compelling individuals.

McConnell has held jobs in which he reported directly to superiors such as Rex Lee, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and for two years he even held top-secret military clearance. In 2001 George W. Bush nominated McConnell to the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (one of a handful of appellate courts just below the U.S. Supreme Court), and after seven years on the bench he stepped away from the 10th Circuit to assume the prestigious directorship of the Stanford Constitutional Law Center, a key position at one of the best law schools in the country. On two separate occasions in 2005 he was on the short list of candidates for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, and throughout his career he has argued a dozen cases before the Supreme Court about issues like freedoms of religion and speech.

Along the way, McConnell, who is one of America’s most important conservative thinkers, laid down deep roots in Utah. His family lived in Salt Lake City from 1996-2009; he taught at the U full-time from 1997-2002 and part-time thereafter until leaving for Stanford.

“When Michael left we lost one of our great intellects at the law school,” said Paul Cassell, a professor at Utah’s S.J. Quinney College of Law and a former federal judge. “We have other (great intellects) as well, but Michael had a national reputation as one of the leading constitutional scholars in the country.”

Faith dominates the intellectual landscape of McConnell’s life. A devout Christian belonging to a Presbyterian congregation, he chooses from among five different translations of the Bible depending on the purpose of his study. He co-edited “Christian Perspectives on Legal Thought,” published by Yale University Press.

As a member of the Deseret News Editorial Advisory board, McConnell brings judicial experience and razor-sharp legal expertise from a conservative, faith-based perspective that is nationally respected and sought after.

“I think that the greatest divide in American culture is not the difference between faithful members of one religion and another,” McConnell said. “But rather, (it’s) between all believers and those who are either indifferent or hostile.”

The story of Michael McConnell begins in suburban Louisville as the younger of two children. His father was a chemical engineer, his mother a homemaker. He earned the rank of Eagle Scout and actively participated in his Christian church. During high school he propelled his debate team to a state championship and wrote for the school newspaper.

“I was not an athlete,” he said. “I ran JV cross country one year. It was very hard, and not very pleasant.”

McConnell went to Michigan State on an academic scholarship. He double-majored in political philosophy and economics, eventually rising to become Opinion Editor of the university’s 35,000-circulation student newspaper. During the summers, McConnell returned to Kentucky and worked as a reporter for his hometown newspaper, the Louisville Courier-Journal.

“I was really debating between law school and journalism as career paths,” McConnell said. “But one thing I noticed while working at the Courier-Journal was that a number of the young reporters whom I most admired burned out and went to law school. So it occurred to me that maybe it was smarter to just go to law school from the beginning.

He applied to only two law schools, earning acceptance from both Yale and Chicago. He chose the latter primarily for two reasons: he found Chicago’s economic approach to the analysis of law to be quite attractive, and Chicago offered him a significantly better financial package than Yale.

“I went to Chicago because I got a full-ride scholarship there,” McConnell said. “(Yale) didn’t offer me much money, and we were not a wealthy family.”

It was while still at Michigan State that McConnell met his future wife, Mary. Near the end of Michael’s law school, the couple married six days after Mary returned stateside from a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford University.

After graduating from law school in 1979 McConnell served two prestigious clerkships, first for Judge J. Skelly Wright on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and then for Justice William J. Brennan Jr. at the U.S. Supreme Court. Thereafter McConnell burnished his Conservative credentials with a stint in the Office of Management and Budget early in the Reagan administration followed by two years as an assistant Solicitor General to Rex Lee, the future president of BYU.

“I worked with (Lee) very closely at the Justice Department,” McConnell said. “He was truly one of the great lawyers of the 20th Century, just enormously intelligent and able to express ideas clearly and forcefully.”

McConnell returned to Chicago Law School in 1985. From 1988-90, he additionally served on a part-time basis as one of three members on the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board that held top-secret intelligence clearance and reported directly to the Commander in Chief.

In 1996 the McConnells, searching for a more family-friendly environment for their three young children, opted to leave Chicago and came to Salt Lake City.

“Unlike some non-Mormons in Utah, I find Mormon culture quite welcoming and attractive,” McConnell said. “While there are some important theological differences, for us it’s not an uncomfortable or unwelcoming environment. I’d rather have a people around who are involved in their religion and are interested in it.”

While teaching at the U., McConnell developed close relationships with several of his fellow faculty. Debora Threedy, a contracts professor and scholar in feminist legal theory whose political views diverge from McConnell’s, nevertheless became fast friends with both he and his wife because of a mutual affinity for hiking. Threedy and the McConnells maintain cabins in southern Utah near Capitol Reef National Park, and to this day they still get together and go hiking or have dinner when they’re at their cabins.

“I think Michael’s a very thoughtful and kind person,” Threedy said. “He gives me hope that liberals and conservatives can find middle ground, because I’m very liberal and Michael is considered fairly conservative. Although sometimes I will disagree with him about how one should go about it, I think we both have the best interests of society at heart.”

Even among his peer law professors, McConnell carried a reputation for exceptional intelligence and mastery of the law.

“One of the things that’s amazing about Michael is his breadth of knowledge,” Cassell said. “He’s not just somebody who specialized in an obscure field of law, but he has command of a wide range of subjects. … You run into certain people in a lifetime that make you say, ‘Wow, the wheels on that guy are just turning faster than anything I’ve ever seen before.’ I’ve run into two people like that during my life — one is Justice (Antonin) Scalia on the U.S. Supreme Court, and the other is Michael McConnell. On both the intellectual wheels turn so rapidly that it’s a pleasure to watch them work.”

In 2005, while McConnell was balancing the 10th Circuit with teaching part-time, a pair of Supreme Court vacancies arose. With his reputation as one of the country’s preeminent conservative jurists and the same Republican president still in office who had nominated McConnell to the 10th Circuit, the national media buzzed about him being on the final list of candidates to replace Chief Justice William Rehnquist or Justice Saundra Day O’Connor. John Roberts and Samuel Alito, however, ultimately filled the vacancies.

“I would’ve loved to do it — I won’t deny that,” McConnell said. “But … I didn’t get all bent out of shape. I know both John Roberts and Sam Alito, think very highly of them, and think that the President chose well.”

Stanford approached McConnell in 2009 with an offer to become director of its Constitutional Law Center. With his window for a Supreme Court nomination likely having passed, he accepted the Stanford position and resigned from both the 10th Circuit and the University of Utah.

The McConnells are now empty nesters. They enjoy a close relationship their two Keeshond dogs and continue to avidly hike during regular visits to their cabin in southern Utah, where they recently spent Christmas with their adult children.

In addition to continuing work on freedom of religion, McConnell is working on constitutional issues involving the Federal Reserve Board and giving a lecture this winter at Harvard on the constitutional thought of the first Treasury Secretary, Alexander Hamilton.

“The work on the court was extremely rewarding,” McConnell said. “But it’s very demanding in the sense that the volume of reading and thinking about the cases is pretty much your life. Now I’m able to read and think and write about things of my own choice.”

E-mail: jaskar@desnews.com

© 2011 Deseret News Publishing Company | All rights reserved

Political Activity By Churches Driving People From Religion

No Comments

By Robert D. Putnam and David E. Campbell

Los Angeles Times

Published: Friday, Nov. 19, 2010 5:57 p.m. MST

The most rapidly growing religious category today is composed of those Americans who say they have no religious affiliation. While middle-age and older Americans continue to embrace organized religion, rapidly increasing numbers of young people are rejecting it.

As recently as 1990, all but 7 percent of Americans claimed a religious affiliation, a figure that had held constant for decades. Today, 17 percent of Americans say they have no religion, and these new “nones” are very heavily concentrated among Americans who have come of age since 1990. Between 25 percent and 30 percent of twenty somethings today say they have no religious affiliation — roughly four times higher than in any previous generation.

Another sociological study should be done regarding the division these issues have had on friendships and associations and the wedge they have driven between people who otherwise would respect and love each other.

‘Us’ have a tendency not to associate with ‘them,’ simply to avoid the inevitable conversational conflicts that arise and make life uncomfortable. The ‘us vs. them’ grouping solidifies the divide by discouraging interaction between people of differing views. Sadly, we have found that silence on politics and religion, the two most valued aspects of an individual, is required to maintain friendships. The question then arises, what good are shallow, artificial friendships? And the answer widens the divide.

The question has been answered. It’s obvious on its face. Politics and religion are divisive to begin with, but mix them and it seems to compound the extent of the intolerance we have for one another.

Politics and religion are the core of conflict and people are frustrated by it. There seems to be no lubricant that works.

For instance, take Utah’s political topic of the day—George W. Bush and torture. Read the comments people, are hurling at Rocky Anderson and, by inference, to all those who are opposed to torture. The newspaper comment boards expose how feeble our brains are. The newspapers have tried to supervise the comments, but they haven’t taken the one step that will elevate the conversation—the requiring of identification. Anonymous comments expose the depths of our ignorance. Not one of the people who hurled invectives at Rocky was willing to identify themselves, and the reason for anonymity was shown in the ignorance of their remarks.

We must learn to communicate better. We all need guidance in how to improve.  We need to make a more devoted effort to improve our communication skills so that we can talk with one another in honest dialogue while maintaining civility and respect.

The answer is in the words we choose and the tone of our voice. It requires enormous restraint, but most of all, it requires a knowledge of the subject that we are so cocksure about. When we recognize our own inadequacies and limitations it makes us less dogmatic in our relationships with others.

So, why this sudden jump in youthful disaffection from organized religion? The surprising answer, according to a mounting body of evidence, is politics. Very few of these new “nones” actually call themselves atheists, and many have rather conventional beliefs about God and theology. But they have been alienated from organized religion by its increasingly conservative politics.

During the 1980s, the public face of American religion turned sharply right.

Political allegiances and religious observance became more closely aligned, and both religion and politics became more polarized. Abortion and homosexuality became more prominent issues on the national political agenda, and activists such as Jerry Falwell and Ralph Reed began looking to expand religious activism into electoral politics. Church attendance gradually became the primary dividing line between Republicans and Democrats in national elections.

This political “God gap” is a recent (more…)

Retired Brig. General David Irvine: Torture Wrong Under Any Circumstance

No Comments

This speech by Brig. Gen. (Ret.) David R. Irvine was given at a protest rally at Pioneer Park in Salt Lake City while former President Bush was signing copies of his recently released book in nearby Sandy. His book contains an admission that he authorized water boarding which is a war crime under the Geneva Conventions.

More than 2,000 people attended the Bush book signing and only about 100 people attended the protest rally. Featured speakers at the protest rally were former mayor Rocky Anderson  and retired Brigadier General David Irvine. These speeches are very persuasive about the need for legal action and we urge everyone to read these speeches.

That a vast majority of Utahns and Americans are willing to turn a blind eye to this clear violation of the laws of the land, and thus endorse torture as part of our culture, is shocking, stunning, and very, very sad. We are supposedly devoted to the idea of Obedience to the Rule of Law. So much for that beautiful concept. It’s a concept that appeared regularly in the speeches of George W. Bush and his administration, but it was all hooey.

This is the speech by Brigadier General Irvine. Anderson’s speech will be posted shortly.

Speech by Brigadier General (Ret.) David Irvine

Pioneer Park, Salt Lake City, November 19, 2010

I would like to begin my comments with an observation. We live in the reddest of red states. As a state, we are pro-life, pro-Constitution, and pro-Rule of Law. PROPOSITION: one cannot be all of these things and ALSO be pro-torture – and still sleep straight in bed at night.

I understand there’s a book-signing in Sandy today, and while I suspect most of you will not be buying that book, I couldn’t resist browsing its table of contents at Barnes & Noble. I was looking for two names, which I didn’t find. One was Maj. Gen. Tony Taguba, who’s a friend of mine. Gen. Taguba was assigned to make the first investigation of the photographs at Abu Ghraib. What he found was a trail of breadcrumbs that led back up the chain of command. In his official report, Gen. Taguba recommended that the scope of the investigation be expanded to determine how far up the chain of command responsibility might go for what had happened there. For his honesty, and for making that recommendation, he was directed to retire. There is a retired Air Force three-star in Boise, who was also directed to retire for recommending that James Miller, the Army two-star who imported Guantanamo’s interrogation techniques to Abu Ghraib, be court-martialed.

I spent three hours at dinner with Gen. Taguba several months ago, and was riveted by what he told me. I begged him to consider writing a book. His answer was, particularly on today’s occasion, interesting. He said, “As a military officer, I believe it’s inappropriate for me to make a profit for carrying out an order I was given.” As a lawyer, I said, “Tony, you could give all the proceeds to the Army Emergency Relief Fund,” but he was unpersuaded.

Another name missing from the index was that of Air Force Col. Mo Davis. Col. Davis was assigned to be the lead Judge Advocate prosecutor for the Bush military commissions at Guantanamo. Col. Davis resigned that assignment and retired after being directed to use evidence tainted by torture in the prosecutions of Guantanamo prisoners. Col. Davis is but one of MANY JAGs who either defended Guantanamo prisoners or refused to use tainted evidence as prosecutors, and paid for their integrity (more…)

‘For Colored Girls’: Movie Review and Response

No Comments

On November 6, 2010 The Tribune printed a movie review of ‘For Colored Girls’ by Tribune movie critic Sean Means. His review is printed below.

The following week Richard Scharine, a professor emeritus in theatre and ethnic studies offered a response.

For convenience they are both published here on the same blog segment.

For Colored Girls

Movie review By Sean P. Means

The Salt Lake Tribune

Published: November 6, 2010 08:41AM

Eight observations after seeing “For Colored Girls”:

Observation No. 1 • The source material for this drama, Ntozake Shange’s 1976 Broadway play, “For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow is Enuf,” must be quite a stage event — chock full of meaty monologues with poetic, powerful language that any actress would be eager to deliver.

Observation No. 2 • It looks like a lot of African-American actresses — sick of the slim pickings usually offered them in Hollywood (the options are often limited to playing Martin Lawrence’s wife or Denzel Washington’s daughter) — jumped at the chance to be in the movie version. The cast includes one Oscar winner (Whoopi Goldberg), three Tony winners (Goldberg, Phylicia Rashad and Anika Noni Rose), and such great but less-heralded performers as Thandie Newton, Kerry Washington, Loretta Devine, Kimberly Elise and Janet Jackson.

Observation No. 3 • Putting these lofty monologues (more…)

Anne Rice Quits Christianity

No Comments

Anne Rice, the bestselling novelist with a reputation for her religiosity, has quit being a Christian. She announced it on her Facebook account and her message has created quite a stir.

Rice declared on her Facebook account:

“For those who care, and I understand if you don’t:  Today I quit being a Christian. I’m out. I remain committed to Christ as always, but not to being a Christian or to being part of Christianity. It’s simply impossible for me to belong to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group. For ten years, I’ve tried. I’ve failed. I’m an outsider. My conscience will allow nothing else.

“I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen.”

As expected, pro and con comments are appearing all over the internet. On Watts Cookin Blpg we have posted a column by Leonard Pitts on the subject. We will post others as well as comments.

Broder Recommends Reading ‘The Empty Chamber’

No Comments

By David S. Broder

The Washington Post

August 6, 2010 12:01AM

Washington • Earlier this week, as the United States Senate went through the motions of debating Elena Kagan’s nomination to a Supreme Court seat that almost certainly will be hers, readers of The New Yorker across the country could review journalist George Packer’s masterful article “The Empty Chamber,” tracing the decline and fall of that same Senate.

Packer shares with thousands of citizens what every reporter who covers the Capitol knows: that the public disdain for Congress, measured in record low approval scores in polls, is mirrored by the frustration of the members of both parties who have to serve and bear the scorn.

I heard it over lunch one day last week from a conservative Republican senator with three years of seniority. He was bitterly disappointed that he did not find the collegial, challenging body that his predecessor had described to him — or the cross-party friendship that Vice President Joe Biden had told him he once enjoyed in his travels with a Republican counterpart from the senator’s own state.

Packer does as good a job as I have ever read (more…)

Learning to Read Comes Before Reading to Learn

No Comments

by Rosemay Winters,

Salt Lake Tribune

Murray » Geniah Stuber, a third-grader at Parkside Elementary, knows why it’s important to learn to read.

“So then you can be, like, smarter,” she said Tuesday during reading time in Mrs. Buehler’s class.

Learning to read by the end of third grade also is a key predictor of children’s future success, according to a new report released by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. But nationally and in Utah, two-thirds of students are not proficient readers when they start fourth grade, according to the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Process or NAEP.

“Up to third grade, children are learning to read,” said Abel Ortiz, the foundation’s director of evidence-based practices. “Starting in fourth grade, they are reading to learn. So if they don’t learn to read by third grade, that greatly impacts their ability to learn in later years.”

It also affects students’ long-term earning potential, Ortiz said, and for low-income kids, their ability to leave poverty behind.

As a teacher back in the mid-60s I taught health to all the seventh graders at Logan Junior High School. After two weeks I would make a list of those students who would be juvenile delinquents by the ninth grade and took it into the principal.

The list was composed entirely of non-readers, and it proved to be a very (more…)

Ah! Vous Dirai – Je, Maman

No Comments

Play Mozart – Ah! Vous Dirai – Je, Maman

Everytime I listen to this I am put to sleep.

Minute Waltz

No Comments

Play the Minute Waltz

Ave Verum Corpus

No Comments

Play Mozart – Ave Verum Corpus

Nocturne No 2

No Comments

Play Chopin – Nocturne No 2

Rhapsody in Blue

1 Comment

Play Gershwin – Rhapsody in Blue

Murray Perahia: Songs Without Words

No Comments

Play Track 23

Murray Perahia: Songs Without Words

No Comments

Play Track 22

Murray Perahia: Songs Without Words

No Comments

Play Track 21