Senator Hatch Opposes Spending Cuts by Obama Administration! What? There Must Be Some Mistake!
No CommentsFunding for CUP must be continued
By Sen. Orrin G. Hatch
Published: Monday, Oct. 18, 2010 12:00 a.m. MDT
In a political move devoid of any policy rationale, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has recommended that the Office of Management and Budget cut the construction budget for the Central Utah Project (CUP).
This recommendation would cut CUP funding just as the decades-long project is nearly ready to deliver water to Utahns. Thus, Salazar would turn hundreds of millions of dollars worth of water infrastructure into a giant white elephant — one that sits in our mountains but does not actually deliver critical water.
The CUP is a federal–local partnership created years ago to build a system of reservoirs and pipelines to store Utah’s annual share of the Colorado River. Projects like the CUP keep the peace among the seven Colorado River Basin states by ensuring each state receives its share of the river.
Fully authorized by law, the CUP has been included in every president’s budget request to Congress since Jimmy Carter. There was an effort to give CUP funding a one-time boost in President Obama’s Stimulus bill, but I did not support it in that form. Otherwise, the project has never been a partisan issue, an earmark or pork. In fact, participating communities in Utah have already paid 35 percent of the cost of construction for the project, and the state’s water users would repay the remaining federal share with interest once the water is delivered. So there is no savings to the overall budget by cutting CUP funding.
So Senator Hatch opposed it for political reasons and now he wants to change his mind. Perhaps Obama listened to him the first time.
We happen to agree that here is another government project that needs to be funded, but what is Obama to do? Hatch wants to stop government spending—but not in his back yard.
Yes, fund the project, but please Senator Hatch, be consistent.
This begs the question of why the secretary would try to cut funding for this vital project. If he succeeds, he would stop the final delivery of CUP water to Utahns. He also would remove the requirement for Utahns to reimburse the federal government for its costs in constructing the project. Utah would be left with reservoirs and pipelines that supply no water (more…)

